Some of you know me personally, some have been my online sisters and BFFs for the longest of time. Some visited
Pretty/Ugly just recently --- whether reluctantly or voluntarily, it doesn't really matter. You were here and you have seen how annoying I can be. I would like to thank each and everyone of you for wasting a little of your time going through my pointless blog. It means a lot to me. You ought to be called saints and heroes because your patience is epic. If you were in front of me right now, I would kiss your feet and call you "your highness".
My name is Lizzie, by the way. I'm a troll.
I'm not habitually obnoxious. I have often been called sedate, soft-spoken and prim & proper in real life. However, many would find my humor offensive. I'm easily misjudged because of my choice of
inappropriate words. I would like to say I'm deeply saddened but that would be lying. The truth is:
I seriously don't give a flying f*ck! (Sorry, Jesus. I know that good Catholic ladies do not utter profanities but I can't help it. This city has taught me how to use the F word in 336,582,912 ways.)
I've been receiving several not-so-pleasant comments
on my last outfit post. Some people actually believe that I'm peddling my breasts to get more clients. Seriously? Must they take everything so literally? I can't help it if my boobs are enchanting but pleaaaaase give me a break! It's awfully frustrating how others don't EVER give my fabulous hindquarters some credit! What is wrong with these people? Boobs are overrated and so '80s.
I know I said that I don't give a damn yet here I am troubling you with my blogging diarrhea. Please don't label me a hypocrite yet. I'm simply using the hate comments (
which I chose to not publish because they're repetitive and quite vitriolic) as an excuse to whine. Whining and wallowing in self pity are some of my favorite leisure activities after all. Good news is, this post won't be about me... much.
I have no tolerance for condescending people (
I knoooow... I'm getting to the not-about-me part in a moment). I don't know how they can derive pleasure from belittling those who they think are weak. Where's the challenge in that? If I want to tear somebody to shreds, I'd rather pick someone my own size. It's more gratifying for my ego if I succeed. Considering my frame, I'll most likely pick an evil baby bunny or a very angry hedgehog.
Moving on...
I often have the honor of meeting uppity photographers (
both hobbyists and pros). They travel in packs like wolves and generally think alike. They must have telepathic powers, like Jacob Black and his fursploding, glitterette-loathing, sparklies-exterminating friends. I try to avoid them because their awesomeness is so terrifying, they make me want to weep and compose sonnets. They all say the same things over and over and over again, like a prayer. Their mantras include:
1. "People who think they're photographers just because they have a DSLR camera are pathetic wannabes."
If you happen to freshly discover photography and decided to buy a costly camera because you want to pursue this newfound interest, you are considered retarded.
In their world, only they are qualified to walk around with big cameras hanging around their necks. Self-entitled much? Also, you can never take pride in your
(still amateurish) work because they're "not good enough" anyway and they'll hate your guts for it.
They deny being enthusiastic newbies, once upon a time, who proudly showed their photos to everyone they knew. Their heads have become overinflated with hubris, they seem to have forgotten that they started from scratch as well (
unless they were born with a badass full frame camera and started taking pictures inside their mothers' wombs from the moment of conception --- unfortunately, not even Jesus can make this feat possible).
2.
"We can take great pictures with a crappy disposable camera and give those wannabes a run for their money.
While I agree that good pictures do not necessarily require a high end camera and professional caliber lenses, I have to say that quality gears
help in producing excellent photos. Kindly note the word "help". If the person behind the lens does not know what he/she is doing, oh well... you know what the outcome will be.
At least he/she has fancy gadgets. Fancy gadgets are always cool. I'm shallow, what can I do?
Do I need to mention printing? In my opinion, you have the right to happily (
H-A-P-P-I-L-Y, not patronizingly) announce that you can take good photographs when you can produce great prints. Pictures can effortlessly look pretty on your lcd panel or your computer screen, but there is no guarantee that they will look decent when printed in, say, A4 size or a 3m x 3m canvas. Phones, tablets and compact cameras have their limitations. Why do you think pro equipment are so expensive?
3.
"You don't need Photoshop if you take good pictures."
They are right. I know a lot of superb photographers who stick to traditional approach and I admire their works. Competitive lensmen (
and women) can create beautiful photographs without any manipulation involved. I, on the other hand, am taking advantage of the technology. To each her own.
My only thought about this matter is this:
Bad pictures are bad. Simple, isn't it?
There is no solution to a bad photograph. Not Photoshop. Not the rosary. Not even voodoo.
Photoshop is
not the new unicorn! It only exists to further improve the quality of an already satisfactory picture.
Satisfactory means well-composed, properly exposed and the subject in focus. It cannot magically transform a third rate snapshot into a word class piece of art.
Not unless you're Jesus.
I use Photoshop not only to enhance my work but also to make it more
Lizzie: delicate and achingly girly. You might have noticed that I am partial to bright and airy photos with a tinge of pink. Please don't judge me. I like pink.
I respect other people's opinions and preferences. I only have a problem with those who have an overwhelming sense of superiority. I imagine that if we could only convert arrogance into money, we'd be living in a wealthy, harmonious world.
Before and After?
No. Not really. This is straight out of the camera. It's untouched (aside from resizing and duplicating for this particular blog entry) . It's a cute shot, yes? I like it.
Did it make me feel like a camera goddess knowing that there's no need for me to post-process this shot? Nah. It simply made me realize how eerily people look under magenta lights.*shudders*
.
.
.
Photoshopped works below. They're not outstanding but they're the only photos available. I was too lazy to go through everything (Three 500 GB worth of external hard disks. That's a LOT) but I wanted to post some examples to prove that even though Photoshop is not the new unicorn, my boobs are still magical.
It is known.
.
.
.
P.S. I will not publish any vulgar comments. If you're a little curious, I got a few mentioning the words sodomy and telephoto lens in the same sentence (most likely from the same person). Hahaha! How very creative!
| NOTE: The makeup artist did a really bad job on the model. You can see the streaks of (dark) foundation. I was not there when the model was being dolled up, else I would have asked the MUA to correct it. |
|
|
|
 |
| Even dogs need some Photoshop loving too. |